The Journal of Research Society of Pakistan (ISSN-0034-5431) provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge and no charges are there for authors to contribute.
Focus of JPUHS:
The Journal of Research Society of Pakistan is recognized by Higher Education Commission of Pakistan and it is a double blind peer reviewed journal. It is committed to publish research articles, scholarly critiques and conceptual contributions to domestic politics, contemporary or historical interest, with particular reference to South Asia and world.
Peer Review Process
All research articles, review articles and policy papers are reviewed by two peer reviewers using a double blind reviewing process. Care is taken to ensure that submissions are reviewed by members of the team with knowledge of the subject area but who do not have a conflict of interest. The anonymous review process has been ensured by Preparing Anonymous Review.
Plagiarism Policy
RSP follows the HEC guidelines/criteria for all types of plagiarism. The same can be accessed at www.hec.gov.pk. All the submitted manuscripts are subjected to plagiarism checking through the software Turnitin (courtesy HEC). Manuscripts with similarity index more than 19% are not processed further unless rectified. It is the authors' responsibility to apprise themselves of plagiarism in any form including paraphrasing and self-plagiarism.
For a plagiarized article (multiple submissions) in processing, the identification of act will lead to dropping of article from further processing / consideration of publication. The corresponding author will be required to give an explanation on demand. In case of an unsatisfactory reply, the matter will be referred to the disciplinary committee that may decide the course of action. For a published article, the allegedly plagiarized article will be temporarily retracted from publication and a notice to the effect will be published in the JPS. The author will be served an explanation demand. In case of non-response in the stipulated time or unsatisfactory explanation, the article will be permanently retracted and the author will be blacklisted. HEC and author's institute will also be notified. In case of multiple submissions, other editors will also be informed. The author(s) will have to provide documentary proof of retraction from publication, if such a defence is pleaded. Those claiming intellectual / idea or data theft of an article must provide documentary proof in their claim.